Senior Russian
Senior Russian
 
Custom Search
Senior Russian
Get it from Microsoft
Free the Animation
Windows 10
Xbox One
4K / HDR
 
 
 
Accelerated Mobile Pages
Senior Russian
Home Page

United Kingdom
United Kingdom
 
 
Go Back

Smartphone









Free the Animation VR / AR
Play to reveal 3D images and 3D models!
 
Android app on Google Play
 
vlrPhone / vlrFilter
Project of very low consumption, radiation and bitrate softphones, with the support of the spatial audio, of the frequency shifts and of the ultrasonic communications / Multifunction Audio Filter with Remote Control!



 

Vectors and 3D Models

City Images, Travel Images, Safe Images

Howto - How To - Illustrated Answers

 

Trump–Russia dossier
Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government during the 2016 election cycle. Campaign members and Russian operatives allegedly colluded to interfere

View Wikipedia Article

This article is part of
a series about
Donald Trump

President of the United States

Incumbent

Presidency

  • Transition
  • Inauguration
  • Timeline
  • Executive actions
    • proclamations
  • Polls
  • Protests
  • Trips
    • international

Appointments

  • Cabinet
    • formation
  • Ambassadors
  • Federal judges
    • Neil Gorsuch
    • Supreme Court candidates
  • U.S. Attorneys
  • Dismissals
    • Sally Yates
    • Michael Flynn
    • James Comey
    • Rex Tillerson

Policy positions

  • Economy
    • tariffs
  • Environment
    • Paris withdrawal
  • Foreign policy
    • as candidate
    • as President
  • Immigration
  • Social issues
    • cannabis
Presidential election
  • 2016 campaign
    • 2020
    • 2000
  • Rallies
  • Primaries
  • Convention
  • Endorsements
  • Debates
  • Republican opposition
    • Never Trump
  • Sexual misconduct allegations
    • Stormy Daniels scandal
Russia controversies
Business projects in Russia
Election interference
timeline
Steele dossier
Classified information disclosure
Links of associates with Russian officials
Trump campaign–Russian meetings
Special Counsel investigation
Business and personal
  • Business career
    • The Trump Organization
  • Books
  • Eponyms
  • Family
  • Foundation
  • Legal affairs
  • Racial views
  • Residences
  • Social media
  • The Apprentice franchise


  • v
  • t
  • e

The Trump–Russia dossier, also known as the Steele dossier, is a private intelligence report comprising 17 memos that were written from June to December 2016 by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence (MI6) officer. It contains allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government during the 2016 election cycle. Campaign members and Russian operatives allegedly colluded to interfere in the election and benefit Trump. The dossier was published in full by BuzzFeed on January 10, 2017. Several mainstream media outlets criticized BuzzFeed's decision to release it.

A private investigative firm, Fusion GPS, provided political opposition research against Trump in two distinct phases, with completely separate funders. Fusion GPS was first contracted by a conservative political website, The Washington Free Beacon, and Steele was not involved in that research. When Trump became the presumptive nominee on May 3, 2016, The Free Beacon stopped their backing. Separately, in April 2016, attorney Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Fusion GPS later subcontracted Steele to research and compile the dossier. Following Trump's election as president, funding from Clinton and the DNC ceased, but Steele continued to work, and was reportedly paid directly by Glenn R. Simpson, a co-founder of Fusion GPS. The completed dossier was then handed to British and American intelligence services.

Some of the dossier's allegations have been confirmed, while others have yet to be proved or disproved. Some claims may require access to classified information for verification. The media, the intelligence community, and most experts have treated the dossier with caution, while Trump himself denounced the report as "fake news". In February 2017, some details related to conversations "solely between foreign nationals" were independently verified. Some of those individuals were known to be "heavily involved" in efforts to damage Clinton and help Trump. The conversations "took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier", giving US intelligence and law enforcement "greater confidence" in the credibility of parts of the document.

Contents
  • 1 History
    • 1.1 Research funded by conservative website
    • 1.2 Research funded by Democrats produces dossier
    • 1.3 Hints of existence: Mother Jones story
    • 1.4 Post-election events
    • 1.5 Publication by BuzzFeed
  • 2 Authorship
  • 3 Allegations
    • 3.1 Cultivation, conspiracy, and cooperation
    • 3.2 Key roles of Manafort, Cohen, and Page
    • 3.3 Kremlin pro-Trump and anti-Clinton
    • 3.4 Kompromat and blackmail: Trump
    • 3.5 Kompromat: Clinton
    • 3.6 DNC email hack, leaks, and misinformation
    • 3.7 Kickbacks and quid pro quo agreements
    • 3.8 Russian spy withdrawn
    • 3.9 Cultivation of various U.S. political figures
    • 3.10 Possible earlier interest in Trump
    • 3.11 Denials of specific claims
      • 3.11.1 Michael Cohen
      • 3.11.2 Paul Manafort
      • 3.11.3 Carter Page
      • 3.11.4 Donald Trump
  • 4 Veracity
    • 4.1 Reputation in the U.S. intelligence community
    • 4.2 Varied reactions about veracity
    • 4.3 Veracity of certain allegations
      • 4.3.1 Russian assistance to the Trump campaign
      • 4.3.2 Republican position on Russian conflict with Ukraine
      • 4.3.3 Relations with Europe and NATO
      • 4.3.4 Lifting of sanctions
      • 4.3.5 Spy withdrawn from Russian embassy
      • 4.3.6 Page meeting with Rosneft officials
      • 4.3.7 Relationship between the Kremlin and WikiLeaks
  • 5 Investigations using or referencing dossier
    • 5.1 Use in the FBI's Russia investigation
    • 5.2 Use in special counsel investigation
    • 5.3 Subject of Nunes memo
  • 6 Reactions
    • 6.1 Individual responses
    • 6.2 Suspicious death of Oleg Erovinkin
    • 6.3 Litigation against BuzzFeed
    • 6.4 Reactions to specific allegations
      • 6.4.1 Allegation of collusion with Russia
  • 7 See also
  • 8 References
  • 9 Further reading
  • 10 External links

History

There were two phases of political opposition research performed against Trump, both using the services of Fusion GPS, but with completely separate funders. Only the second phase produced the Steele dossier.

Research funded by conservative website

In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer, hired the American research firm Fusion GPS to conduct general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. For months, Fusion GPS gathered information about Trump, focusing on his business and entertainment activities. When Trump became the presumptive nominee on May 3, 2016, The Free Beacon stopped funding research on him.

Although the source of the Steele dossier's funding had already been reported correctly over a year before, a February 2, 2018 story by the Associated Press (AP) contributed to confusion about its funding by stating that the dossier "was initially funded" by the Washington Free Beacon, so the AP posted a correction the next day: "Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it." At no point in time did the Free Beacon have any connection with the production of the Steele dossier, and the Free Beacon stated that "none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier."

Research funded by Democrats produces dossier

The second phase of opposition research was funded by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, working through their attorney of record, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie. In April 2016, Elias hired Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump.

As part of their investigation, Fusion GPS hired Orbis Business Intelligence, a private British intelligence firm, to look into connections between Trump and Russia. Orbis co-founder Christopher Steele, a retired British MI6 officer with expertise in Russian matters, was hired as a subcontractor to do the job. In total, Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS $1.02 million in fees and expenses, $168,000 of which was paid to Orbis by Fusion GPS and used by them to produce the dossier.

Orbis was hired between June and November 2016, and Steele produced 16 memos during that time, with a 17th memo added in December. The memos were like "prepublication notes" based on reports from Steele's sources, and were not released as a fully vetted and "finished news article". Steele believes that 70–90% of the dossier is accurate, a view that is shared by Simpson.

Simpson has stated that, to his knowledge, Steele did not pay any of his sources. According to investigative reporter Jane Mayer of The New Yorker, Orbis has a large number of paid "collectors" who "harvest intelligence from a much larger network of unpaid sources, some of whom don't even realize they are being treated as informants but money doesn't change hands, because it could risk violating laws against, say, bribing government officials or insider trading. Paying sources might also encourage them to embellish." According to British journalist Luke Harding, Steele's sources were not new: "They're not people that he kind of discovered yesterday. They are trusted contacts who essentially had proven themselves in other areas." Howard Blum said that Steele leaned on sources "whose loyalty and information he had bought and paid for over the years".

According to Fusion GPS's co-owners, Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, they did not tell Steele who their ultimate clients were, only that Steele was "working for a law firm", and they "gave him no specific marching orders beyond this basic question: 'Why did Mr. Trump repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state that most serious investors shun?'" Mayer reported that when the Clinton campaign "indirectly employed" Steele, Elias created a "legal barrier" by acting "as a firewall" between the campaign and Steele. Thus, any details were "protected by attorney-client privilege. Fusion briefed only Elias on the reports. Simpson sent Elias nothing on paper—he was briefed orally." Only several months after signing the contract with Fusion GPS did Steele learn that the DNC and the Clinton campaign were the ultimate clients. The firewall was reportedly so effective that even campaign principals John Podesta and Robby Mook did not know that Steele was on the Democratic payroll until Mother Jones reported on the issue on October 31, 2016.

Steele delivered his reports individually as one- to three-page memos. The first memo, dated June 20, 2016, was sent to Washington by courier and hand-delivered to Fusion GPS. The names of the sources were redacted, "providing instead descriptions of them that enabled Fusion to assess their basic credibility."

Steele has stated that he soon found "troubling information indicating connections between Trump and the Russian government." According to his sources, "there was an established exchange of information between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin of mutual benefit." According to Harding, "Steele was shocked by the extent of collusion his sources were reporting," and told his friends: "For anyone who reads it, this is a life-changing experience." Steele felt that what he had unearthed "was something of huge significance, way above party politics." American reporter Howard Blum described Steele's rationale for becoming a whistleblower: "The greater good trumps all other concerns."

On his own initiative, Steele decided to also pass the information to British and American intelligence services because he believed the findings were a matter of national security for both countries. According to Simpson's testimony, Steele approached the FBI because he was concerned that Trump, then a candidate, was being blackmailed by Russia, and he became "very concerned about whether this represented a national security threat". When Steele showed his findings to FBI agents in Rome in early July; their reaction was "shock and horror".

Steele enjoyed a good working reputation "for the knowledge he had developed over nearly 20 years working on Russia-related issues for British intelligence." Knowing this, in October 2016, a few weeks before the election, the FBI agreed to pay him to continue collecting information. However, the subsequent public release of the dossier stopped discussions between Steele and the FBI. Simpson testified that "Steele wasn't paid by the FBI, but was possibly reimbursed for a trip to Rome to meet with FBI officials." According to Mayer, Steele "did request compensation for travelling to Rome, but he never received any."

Simpson later revealed that "Steele severed his contacts with FBI before the election following public statements by the FBI that it had found no connection between the Trump campaign and Russia and concerns that was being 'manipulated for political ends by the Trump people'." Steele had become frustrated with the FBI, whom he believed failed to investigate his reports, choosing instead to focus on the investigation into Clinton's emails. According to The Independent, Steele came to believe that there was a "cabal" inside the FBI, particularly its New York field office linked to Trump advisor Rudy Giuliani, because it blocked any attempts to investigate the links between Trump and Russia.

Hints of existence: Mother Jones story

By the third quarter of 2016, many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists. However, they chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.

By October 2016, Steele had compiled 33 pages (16 memos), and he then passed on what he had discovered to David Corn, a reporter from Mother Jones magazine. On October 31, 2016, a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI. The article disclosed some of the dossier's allegations:

The first memo, based on the former intelligence officer’s conversations with Russian sources, noted, "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance". It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals". It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him". It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Hillary Clinton based on "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls."

— David Corn, "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump", Mother Jones (October 31, 2016)

When the Mother Jones story broke, John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign, said he was "stunned by the news that the F.B.I. had launched a full-blown investigation into Trump, especially one that was informed by research underwritten by the Clinton campaign." Although they knew that Perkins Coie had spent money for opposition research, neither Podesta nor campaign manager Robby Mook knew that Steele was on the Democratic payroll. They both maintain they "didn't read the dossier until BuzzFeed posted it online. Far from a secret campaign weapon, Steele turned out to be a secret kept from the campaign."

Post-election events

After Trump's election on November 8, 2016, the Democratic client stopped paying for the investigation, but Steele continued working on the dossier for Fusion GPS. At that time, Simpson "reportedly spent his own money to continue the investigation". After the election, Steele's dossier "became one of Washington's worst-kept secrets, and journalists worked to verify the allegations.

On November 18, 2016, U.S. Senator John McCain, who had been informed about the alleged links between the Kremlin and Trump, met with former British ambassador to Moscow Sir Andrew Wood at the Halifax International Security Forum in Canada. Wood told McCain about the existence of the collected materials about Trump, and also vouched for Steele's professionalism and integrity.

Steele agreed with Fusion GPS to deliver a hard copy of all 16 memos to McCain, which he received in early December from David J. Kramer, a former U.S. State Department official working at Arizona State University. On December 9, McCain met personally with FBI Director James Comey to pass on the information. Comey later confirmed that counterintelligence investigations were under way into possible links between Trump associates and Moscow.

After having delivered his 16 memos, Steele received more information and composed the two-page "December memo", dated December 13. It mostly contained allegations against Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, which he denied. In an April 2017 court filing, Steele revealed previously unreported information that he had given a copy of his last memo to a "senior UK government national security official acting in his official capacity, on a confidential basis in hard copy form", because it "had implications for the national security of the US and the UK".

Publication by BuzzFeed

In early January 2017, President-elect Trump and President Barack Obama were separately briefed on the existence of the dossier by the chiefs of several U.S. intelligence agencies. Vice President Joe Biden has confirmed that he and the president had received briefings on the dossier, and the allegations within. Trump later expressed that he felt that James Comey was trying to blackmail him at the meeting in Trump Tower, held two weeks before the inauguration.

On January 10, 2017, CNN reported that classified documents presented to Obama and Trump the previous week included allegations that Russian operatives possess "compromising personal and financial information" about Trump. CNN stated that it would not publish specific details on the memos because it had not "independently corroborated the specific allegations". Following the CNN report, BuzzFeed published a 35-page dossier that it said was the basis of the briefing, including unverified claims that Russian operatives had collected "embarrassing material" involving Trump that could be used to blackmail him.

BuzzFeed was harshly criticized for publishing what Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan called "scurrilous allegations dressed up as an intelligence report meant to damage Donald Trump", while The New York Times noted that the publication sparked a debate centering on the use of unsubstantiated information from anonymous sources. BuzzFeed's executive staff said the materials were newsworthy because they were "in wide circulation at the highest levels of American government and media" and argued that this justified public release.

Authorship

When CNN reported the existence of the dossier on January 10, 2017, it did not name the author of the dossier, but revealed that he was British. Steele concluded that his anonymity had been "fatally compromised", and, realizing it was "only a matter of time until his name became public knowledge", he fled into hiding with his family, in fear of "a prompt and potentially dangerous backlash against him from Moscow". The Wall Street Journal revealed Steele's name the next day, on January 11. Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, for whom Steele worked at the time the dossier was authored, and its director Christopher Burrows, would not confirm or deny that Orbis had produced the dossier. On March 7, 2017, as some members of the U.S. Congress were expressing interest in meeting with or hearing testimony from Steele, he reemerged after weeks in hiding, appearing publicly on camera and stating, "I'm really pleased to be back here working again at the Orbis's offices in London today."

Called by the media a "highly regarded Kremlin expert" and "one of MI6's greatest Russia specialists", Steele formerly worked for the British intelligence agency MI6. He entered MI6 in 1987, directly after his graduation from Cambridge University. He currently works for Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, a private intelligence company he co-founded in London.

Wood, the former British ambassador to Moscow, has vouched for Steele's reputation. He views Steele as a "very competent professional operator ... I take the report seriously. I don't think it's totally implausible." He also stated that "the report's key allegation—that Trump and Russia's leadership were communicating via secret back channels during the presidential campaign—was eminently plausible". FBI investigators reportedly treat Steele "as a peer", whose experience as a trusted Russia expert has included assisting the Justice Department, British prime ministers, and at least one U.S. president.

Allegations Vladimir Putin meets with U.S. President Donald Trump at the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, July 2017 Michael Cohen (2011) Carter Page (2017)

The dossier contains multiple allegations, some of which are currently unverified and others for which possible verification is classified. Trump and Putin have repeatedly denied the allegations, with Trump labeling the dossier as "discredited", "debunked", "fictitious", and "fake news".

Cultivation, conspiracy, and cooperation
  • That "Russian authorities" had cultivated Trump "for at least 5 years", and that the operation was "supported and directed" by Putin. (Dossier, p. 1)
  • That Putin aimed to spread "discord and disunity" within the United States and between Western allies, whom he saw as a threat to Russia's interests. (Dossier, p. 1-2)
  • That Trump was a "divisive" and "anti-Establishment" candidate, as well as "a pragmatist with whom they could do business". That Trump would remain a divisive force even if not elected. (Dossier, p. 29)
  • That a major goal of the Russians in supporting Trump was "to upset the liberal international status quo, including on Ukraine-related sanctions, which was seriously disadvantaging the country. (Dossier, p. 28-29)
  • That the Russian government's support for Trump was originally conducted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, then by the Federal Security Service (FSB), and was eventually directly handled by the Russian presidency because of its "growing significance over time." (Dossier, p. 29)
  • That Trump had "so far declined various sweetener real estate business deals", but had "accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin," notably on his political rivals. (Dossier, p. 1)
  • That there was "a well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between and the Russian leadership," with information willingly exchanged in both directions. That this co-operation was "sanctioned at highest levels and involving Russian diplomatic staff based in the US." That the Trump campaign used "moles within DNC and hackers in the US as well as outside in Russia." (Dossier, pp. 7)
  • That Trump associates had established "an intelligence exchange for at least 8 years." That Trump and his team had delivered "intelligence on the activities, business and otherwise, in the US of leading Russian oligarchs and their families", as requested by Putin." (Dossier, p. 11)
  • That the Trump camp became angry and resentful toward Putin when they realized he was not only aiming to weaken Clinton and bolster Trump, but was attempting to "undermine the US government and democratic system more generally." (Dossier, p. 17)
Key roles of Manafort, Cohen, and Page
  • That then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort had "managed" the "conspiracy of co-operation", and that he used Trump's foreign policy adviser, Carter Page, and others, "as intermediaries". (Dossier, p. 7)
  • That Page had "conceived and promoted" the idea of leaking the stolen DNC emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 Democratic National Convention. (Dossier, p. 7, 17)
  • That Cohen played a "key role" in the Trump–Russia relationship by arranging cover-ups and "deniable cash payments", and that his role had grown after Manafort had left the campaign. (Dossier, pp. 18, 32, 34-35)
  • That "COHEN now was heavily engaged in a cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of TRUMP's relationship with Russia being exposed." (Dossier, p. 32)
Kremlin pro-Trump and anti-Clinton
  • That Putin feared and hated Hillary Clinton. (Dossier, p. 7)
  • That there was a "Kremlin campaign to aid TRUMP and damage CLINTON". (Dossier, pp. 7, 13)
  • That Putin's interference operation had an "objective of weakening CLINTON and bolstering TRUMP". (Dossier, p. 17)
Kompromat and blackmail: Trump
  • That Trump "hated" Obama so much that when he stayed in the Presidential suite of the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Moscow, he employed "a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers' (urination) show in front of him" in order to defile the bed used by the Obamas on an earlier visit. The alleged incident from 2013 was reportedly filmed and recorded by the FSB as kompromat. (Dossier, p. 2)
  • That Trump was susceptible to blackmail due to his "unorthodox behavior in Russia" and the "embarrassing material" on him. (Dossier, p. 2)
  • That the Kremlin had assured Trump they would not use kompromat collected against him, "given high levels of voluntary co-operation forthcoming from his team." (Dossier, p. 11-12)
  • That Trump had explored the real estate sectors in St Petersburg and Moscow, "but in the end TRUMP had had to settle for the use of extensive sexual services there from local prostitutes rather than business success". (Dossier, p. 8)
  • That Trump has pursued real estate deals in St Petersburg, and "paid bribes there to further his interests". That witnesses to his "sex parties in the city" had been "'silenced' i.e. bribed or coerced to disappear." (Dossier, p. 27)
  • That Trump associates did not fear "the negative media publicity surrounding alleged Russian interference", because it distracted attention from his "business dealings in China and other emerging markets", which involved "large bribes and kickbacks" that could be devastating if revealed. (Dossier, p. 8)
Kompromat: Clinton Dmitry Peskov (2017)
  • That Putin ordered the maintenance of a secret dossier on Hillary Clinton, with content dating back to the time of her husband's presidency. The dossier comprised eavesdropped conversations, either from bugging devices or from phone intercepts; it did not contain "details/evidence of unorthodox or embarrassing behavior", but focused more on "things she had said which contradicted her current positions on various issues".
  • That the Clinton dossier had been collated by the FSB and was managed by Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary. (Dossier, pp. 1, 3)
DNC email hack, leaks, and misinformation
  • That Russia was responsible for the DNC email hacks and the recent appearance of the stolen DNC e-mails on WikiLeaks, and that the reason for using WikiLeaks was "plausible deniability". (Dossier, pp. 7–8)
  • That "the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team." (Dossier, p. 8)
  • That after the emails had been forwarded to WikiLeaks, it was decided to not leak more, but to engage in misinformation: "Rather the tactics would be to spread rumours and misinformation about the content of what already had been leaked and make up new content." (Dossier, p. 15)
  • That Page had intended the email leaks "to swing supporters of Bernie SANDERS away from Hillary CLINTON and across to TRUMP." (Dossier, p. 17)
  • That the hacking of the DNC servers was performed by Romanian hackers ultimately controlled by Putin and paid by both Trump and Putin. (Dossier, pp. 34–35)
  • That Cohen, together with three colleagues, secretly met with Kremlin officials in the Prague offices of Rossotrudnichestvo in August 2016, where he arranged "deniable cash payments" to the hackers and sought "to cover up all traces of the hacking operation", as well as "cover up ties between Trump and Russia, including Manafort's involvement in Ukraine". (Dossier, pp. 18, 34-35)
Kickbacks and quid pro quo agreements
  • That Viktor Yanukovych, the former pro-Russian President of Ukraine, had told Putin that he had been making supposedly untraceable "kick-back payments" to Manafort while he was Trump's campaign manager. (Dossier, p. 20)
  • That in return for Russia's leaking the stolen documents to WikiLeaks, "the TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue and to raise US/NATO defense commitments in the Baltics and Eastern Europe to deflect attention away from Ukraine, a priority for PUTIN who needed to cauterise the subject." (Dossier, pp. 7–8)
  • That Page had secretly met Rosneft chairman Igor Sechin in Moscow, together with a "senior Kremlin Internal Affairs official, DIVYEKIN." That Sechin offered Trump a 19% stake in Rosneft (worth about $11 billion) in exchange for lifting the sanctions against Russia after his election. That Page confirmed, on Trump's "full authority", that he intended to lift the sanctions. (Dossier, pp. 9, 30-32)
Russian spy withdrawn
  • That Russia had hastily withdrawn from Washington their diplomat Mikhail Kalugin (misspelled as "Kulagin"), whose prominent role in the interference operation should remain hidden. (Dossier, p. 23)
Cultivation of various U.S. political figures
  • That the Kremlin had been "supporting various US political figures", had funded Moscow visits by Lyndon Larouche representatives, Jill Stein, Carter Page and Michael Flynn, and was satisfied with the outcome. (Dossier, p. 15-16)
Possible earlier interest in Trump

Although the dossier alleged in June 2016 that the Kremlin had been cultivating Trump for "at least five years", Harding wrote that the Soviet Union had been interested in him since 1987. In his book Collusion, Harding asserts that the "top level of the Soviet diplomatic service arranged his 1987 Moscow visit. With assistance from the KGB." Then-KGB head Vladimir Kryuchkov "wanted KGB staff abroad to recruit more Americans." Harding proceeds to describe the KGB's cultivation process, and posits that they may have opened a file on Trump as early as 1977, when he had married Czech model Ivana Zelníčková; the Soviet spies may have closely observed and analyzed the couple from that time on.

Denials of specific claims Michael Cohen

The dossier alleges efforts by Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, to pay those who had hacked the DNC and to "cover up all traces of the hacking operation". Cohen has denied the allegations against him, stating that he was in Los Angeles between August 23 and 29, and in New York for the entire month of September. According to a Czech intelligence source, there is no record of him entering Prague by plane, but Respekt magazine and Politico pointed out that he could have entered by car or train from a neighboring country within the Schengen Area, for example Italy. In the latter case, a record of Cohen entering the Schengen zone from a non-Schengen country should exist.

On April 13, 2018, McClatchy reported that the Mueller investigation had evidence that Cohen visited Prague in August or early September 2016 by traveling through Germany. The following day, Cohen again denied he has "ever been to Prague".

Paul Manafort

Manafort has "denied taking part in any collusion with the Russian state, but registered himself as a foreign agent retroactively after it was revealed his firm received more than $17m working as a lobbyist for a pro-Russian Ukrainian party."

Carter Page

Page originally denied meeting any Russian officials, but his later testimony, acknowledging that he had met with senior Russian officials at Rosneft, has been interpreted as corroboration of portions of the dossier.

Donald Trump

Trump has denied the salacious "golden showers" allegations, claiming he is a "germaphobe". In April 2018, James Comey said he does not know whether Trump "was with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow in 2013", adding "It's possible, but I don't know." At the time he was fired, the allegations had not been verified, Comey said.

Jonathan Chait wrote about how James Comey, in his book, A Higher Loyalty, describes how Trump "mixed his denials of the pee tape with obvious lies". Chait also stated that "Trump's alibi is at least partly false"; Comey related that Trump "argued that could not be true because he had not stayed overnight in Moscow but had only used the hotel room to change his clothes." Chait then asked: "Why would Trump offer up a false alibi for something that isn't true?"

Trump not only spent the night in the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Moscow that weekend, according to Trump's close acquaintance, Aras Agalarov, he actually stayed in the Presidential suite, where the "golden showers" incident is alleged to have occurred.

Trump's longtime bodyguard Keith Schiller "privately testified that he rejected an offer by a Russian individual to send five women to Trump's hotel room during their 2013 trip to Moscow," stating that "he took the offer as a joke ... and Trump laughed it off." After staying outside the door for a few minutes, he left. "One source noted that Schiller testified he eventually left Trump's hotel room door and could not say for sure what happened during the remainder of the night."

Comey wrote in his book that Trump mentioned "the golden showers things" and told him that "it bothered him if there was 'even a one percent chance' his wife, Melania, thought it was true." Trump "told him to consider having the FBI investigate the prostitutes allegation to 'prove it was a lie'."

Veracity

There are those who trust the dossier, and those who question its veracity. Steele and the dossier have become "the central point of contention in the political brawl raging around" the Special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Some consider Steele a hero who tried to warn about the Kremlin's meddling in the election, and others consider him a "hired gun" used to attack Trump.

Reputation in the U.S. intelligence community

On January 11, 2017, it was reported that, according to Paul Wood of BBC News, the salacious information in Steele's report is also reported by "multiple intelligence sources" and "at least one East European intelligence service". They report that "compromising material on Mr. Trump" included "more than one tape, not just video, but audio as well, on more than one date, in more than one place, in both Moscow and St. Petersburg." While also mentioning that "nobody should believe something just because an intelligence agent says it", he added that "the CIA believes it is credible that the Kremlin has such kompromat—or compromising material—on the next US commander in chief" and "a joint taskforce, which includes the CIA and the FBI, has been investigating allegations that the Russians may have sent money to Mr Trump's organisation or his election campaign".

On January 12, 2017, Susan Hennessey, a former National Security Agency lawyer now with the Brookings Institution, stated: "My general take is that the intelligence community and law enforcement seem to be taking these claims seriously. That itself is highly significant. But it is not the same as these allegations being verified. Even if this was an intelligence community document—which it isn't—this kind of raw intelligence is still treated with skepticism." Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes wrote that "the current state of the evidence makes a powerful argument for a serious public inquiry into this matter".

On February 10, 2017, CNN reported that some communications between "senior Russian officials and other Russian individuals" described in the dossier had been corroborated by multiple U.S. officials. They "took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier". Sources told CNN that some conversations had been "intercepted during routine intelligence gathering", but refused to reveal the content of conversations, or specify which communications were intercepted "due to the classified nature of US intelligence collection programs". CNN was unable to confirm whether conversations were related to Trump. U.S. officials said the corroboration gave "US intelligence and law enforcement 'greater confidence' in the credibility of some aspects of the dossier as they continue to actively investigate its contents". They also reported that American intelligence agencies had examined Steele and his "vast network throughout Europe and found him and his sources to be credible."

On March 30, 2017, Paul Wood reported that the FBI was using the dossier as a road map for its investigation. On April 18, 2017, CNN reported that, according to U.S. officials, information from the dossier had been used as part of the basis for getting the FISA warrant to monitor Page during the summer of 2016. Officials told CNN this information would have had to be independently corroborated by the FBI before being used to obtain the warrant.

British journalist Julian Borger wrote on October 7, 2017, that "Steele's reports are being taken seriously after lengthy scrutiny by federal and congressional investigators", at least Steele's assessment that Russia had conducted a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election to Clinton's detriment; that part of the Steele dossier "has generally gained in credibility, rather than lost it".

On October 11, 2017, it was reported that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), member of the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), had stated: "As I understand it, a good deal of his information remains unproven, but none of it has been disproven, and considerable amounts of it have been proven."

On October 27, 2017, Robert S. Litt, a former lawyer for the Director of National Intelligence, was quoted as stating that the dossier "played absolutely no role" in the intelligence community's determination that Russia had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

On December 7, 2017, commentator Jonathan Chait wrote that mainstream media "treat as gossip" whereas the intelligence community "take it seriously".

Varied reactions about veracity

While Steele, the author of the dossier, said he believes that 70–90% of the dossier is accurate, other observers and experts have had varying reactions to the dossier. Generally, "former intelligence officers and other national-security experts" urged "skepticism and caution" but still took "the fact that the nation's top intelligence officials chose to present a summary version of the dossier to both President Obama and President-elect Trump" as an indication "that they may have had a relatively high degree of confidence that at least some of the claims therein were credible, or at least worth investigating further".

Biden told reporters that while he and Obama were receiving a briefing on the extent of election hacking attempts, there was a two-page addendum which addressed the contents of the Steele dossier. Top intelligence officials told them they "felt obligated to inform them about uncorroborated allegations about President-elect Donald Trump out of concern the information would become public and catch them off-guard".

On January 11, 2017, Newsweek published a list of "13 things that don't add up" in the dossier, writing that it was a "strange mix of the amateur and the insightful" and stating that it "contains lots of Kremlin-related gossip that could indeed be, as the author claims, from deep insiders—or equally gleaned" from Russian newspapers and blogs. Former UK ambassador to Russia Sir Tony Brenton stated that certain aspects of the dossier were inconsistent with British intelligence's understanding of how the Kremlin works, commenting: "I've seen quite a lot of intelligence on Russia, and there are some things in which look pretty shaky."

In his June 2017 congressional testimony, former FBI director James Comey called "some personally sensitive aspects" of the dossier "salacious and unverified," but he did not state that the entire dossier was unverified or that the salacious aspects were false. When Senator Richard Burr asked if any of the allegations in the dossier had been confirmed, Comey said he could not answer that question in a public setting.

Veracity of certain allegations Russian assistance to the Trump campaign Main articles: Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and Trump campaign–Russian meetings

A January 6, 2017, assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russian leadership favored the Trump candidacy over Clinton's, and that Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process," as well as ordering cyber attacks on "both major U.S. political parties".

Newsweek stated that a dossier allegation was confirmed by this assessment. ABC News stated that "some of the dossier's broad implications—particularly that Russian President Vladimir Putin launched an operation to boost Trump and sow discord within the U.S. and abroad—now ring true." Referring to the ODNI assessment, former Los Angeles Times Moscow correspondent Robert Gillette wrote in an op-ed in the Concord Monitor that the dossier has had at least one of its main factual assertions verified....Steele's dossier, paraphrasing multiple sources, reported precisely the same conclusion, in greater detail, six months earlier, in a memo dated June 20."

In The New Yorker, Mayer has stated that the allegation that Trump was favored by the Kremlin, and that they offered Trump's campaign dirt on Clinton, has proven true.

In March 2016, George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, learned that the Russians had "dirt" on Clinton in the form of thousands of stolen emails. This occurred before the hacking of the DNC computers had become public knowledge. Papadopoulos sent emails about Putin to at least seven Trump campaign officials. Trump national campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis encouraged Papadopoulos to fly to Russia and meet with agents of the Russian Foreign Ministry, who reportedly wanted to share "Clinton dirt" with the Trump campaign. Later, on June 9, 2016, a meeting in Trump Tower was held, ostensibly for representatives from Russia to deliver the Clinton "dirt" to the Trump campaign.

Republican position on Russian conflict with Ukraine

The dossier alleges that "the Trump campaign agreed to minimize US opposition to Russia's incursions into Ukraine". Harding considers this allegation to have been confirmed by the actions of the Trump campaign: "This is precisely what happened at the Republican National Convention last July, when language on the US's commitment to Ukraine was mysteriously softened." In July 2016, the Republican National Convention made changes to the Republican Party's platform on Ukraine: initially the platform proposed providing "lethal weapons" to Ukraine, but the line was changed to "appropriate assistance". NPR reported, "Diana Denman, a Republican delegate who supported arming U.S. allies in Ukraine, has told people that Trump aide J.D. Gordon said at the Republican Convention in 2016 that Trump directed him to support weakening that position in the official platform." J. D. Gordon, who was one of Trump's national security advisers during the campaign, said that he had advocated for changing language because that reflected what Trump had said. The Trump campaign does not appear to have intervened in any other platform deliberations aside from the language on Ukraine.

Trump had formerly taken a hard line on Ukraine. He initially denounced Russia's annexation of Crimea as a "land grab" that "should never have happened", and called for a firmer U.S. response, saying "We should definitely be strong. We should definitely do sanctions." But after hiring Manafort his approach changed; he said he might recognize Crimea as Russian territory and might lift the sanctions against Russia.

Relations with Europe and NATO Vladimir Putin (2017)

The dossier alleges that as part of a quid pro quo agreement, "the TRUMP team had agreed… to raise US/NATO defense commitments in the Baltics and Eastern Europe to deflect attention away from Ukraine, a priority for PUTIN who needed to cauterise the subject." Aiko Stevenson, writing in The Huffington Post, noted that some of Trump's actions seem to align with "Putin's wish list", which "includes lifting sanctions on Russia, turning a blind eye towards its aggressive efforts in the Ukraine, and creating a divisive rift amongst western allies." During the campaign Trump "called Nato, the centrepiece of Transatlantic security 'obsolete', championed the disintegration of the EU, and said that he is open to lifting sanctions on Moscow." Harding adds that Trump repeatedly "questioned whether US allies were paying enough into Nato coffers." Jeff Stein, writing in Newsweek, described how "Trump's repeated attacks on NATO have...frustrated...allies ... raised questions as to whether the president has been duped into facilitating Putin's long-range objective of undermining the European Union."

Lifting of sanctions

The dossier says that Page, claiming to speak with Trump's authority, had confirmed that Trump would lift the existing sanctions against Russia if he were elected president. On December 29, 2016, during the transition period between the election and the inauguration, National Security Advisor designate Flynn spoke to Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, urging him not to retaliate for newly imposed sanctions; the Russians took his advice and did not retaliate. Within days after the inauguration, new Trump administration officials ordered State Department staffers to develop proposals for immediately revoking the economic and other sanctions. One retired diplomat later said, "What was troubling about these stories is that suddenly I was hearing that we were preparing to rescind sanctions in exchange for, well, nothing." The staffers alerted Congressional allies who took steps to codify the sanctions into law. The attempt to overturn the sanctions was abandoned after Flynn's conversation was revealed and Flynn resigned. In August 2017, Congress passed a bipartisan bill to impose new sanctions on Russia. Trump reluctantly signed the bill, but then refused to implement it.

Spy withdrawn from Russian embassy

The dossier alleges that a "Russian diplomat Mikhail KULAGIN " participated in US election meddling, and was recalled to Moscow because Kremlin was concerned that his role in the meddling would be exposed. The BBC later reported that US officials in 2016 had identified Russian diplomat Mikhail Kalugin as a spy and that he was under surveillance, thus "verifying" a key claim in the dossier. Kalugin was the head of the economics section at the Russian embassy. He returned to Russia in August 2016. McClatchy reported that the FBI was investigating whether Kalugin played a role in the election interference. Kalugin has denied the allegations.

Page meeting with Rosneft officials

Jane Mayer said that this part of the dossier seems true, even if the name of an official may have been wrong. Page's congressional testimony confirmed he held secret meetings with top Moscow and Rosneft officials, including talks about a payoff: "When Page was asked if a Rosneft executive had offered him a 'potential sale of a significant percentage of Rosneft,' Page said, 'He may have briefly mentioned it'."

On November 2, 2017, Page appeared before the House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI) which is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. He testified that he informed Jeff Sessions, J. D. Gordon, Hope Hicks, and Corey Lewandowski, Trump's campaign manager, of a planned trip to Russia, and that Lewandowski approved the trip, responding "If you'd like to go on your own, not affiliated with the campaign, you know, that's fine." In his testimony, Page admitted he met with high ranking Kremlin officials. Previously, Page had denied meeting any Russian officials during the trip. His comments appeared to corroborate portions of the dossier. Newsweek has listed the claim about Page meeting with Rosneft officials as "verified".

Relationship between the Kremlin and WikiLeaks Main articles: 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak and Democratic National Committee cyber attacks

Mayer agrees with Steele that the Kremlin and WikiLeaks cooperated to release the stolen DNC emails, as stated by the U.S. Intelligence Community. On December 9, 2016, the CIA told U.S. legislators that the U.S. Intelligence Community concluded Russia conducted operations during the 2016 U.S. election to prevent Clinton from winning the presidency. Three U.S intelligence agencies concluded that people with direct ties to the Kremlin had sent hacked emails from the DNC to WikiLeaks.

Investigations using or referencing dossier Use in the FBI's Russia investigation Main article: Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

At some time during the summer of 2016, the FBI began an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections, spurred by comments made by Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos.

While Trump and some Republicans have claimed that the dossier was behind the beginning of the FBI investigation into his campaign's potential conspiracy with Russia, in December 2017, former and current intelligence officials revealed that the actual impetus was a series of comments made in May 2016 by Papadopoulos to a top Australian diplomat during a night of "heavy drinking at an upscale London bar". Papadopoulos revealed that he had inside information by bragging that the Kremlin had "thousands of emails" stolen from Clinton which could be used to damage her campaign. He had learned this about three weeks earlier. Two months later, when WikiLeaks started releasing DNC emails, Australian officials alerted the Americans about Papadopoulos' remarks. Over a year later, in October 2017, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, and became a cooperating witness in Mueller's investigation.

Other factors then played into the FBI's decision to investigate Russian interference and the Trump campaign: intelligence from friendly governments, especially the British and Dutch, and information about Page's Moscow trip. Steele's first report was sent to Fusion GPS, dated June 20, 2016, and FBI agents first interviewed Steele in October 2016. CNN later reported that the FBI had used the dossier to bolster its existing investigations.

Use in special counsel investigation Main article: Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)

According to Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman Mark Warner (D-VA), the dossier's allegations are being investigated by a Special Counsel led by Robert Mueller, which, since May 2017, has been investigating allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections. In the summer of 2017, Mueller's team of investigators met with Steele. As some leads stemming from the dossier have already been followed and confirmed by the FBI, legal experts have stated that Special Counsel investigators, headed by Robert Mueller, are obligated to follow any leads the dossier has presented them with, irrespective of what parties financed it in its various stages of development, or "hey would be derelict in their duty if they didn't."

Subject of Nunes memo Main article: Nunes memo

On February 2, 2018, the Nunes memo, a four-page memorandum written for U.S. Representative Devin Nunes by his staff, was released to the public. Referring to the dossier, the memo alleges that the FBI "may have relied on politically motivated or questionable sources" to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in October 2016 and in three subsequent renewals on Page in the early phases of the FBI's interference investigation. Republican legislators argued that the memo presents evidence that a group of politically-biased FBI employees abused the FISA warrant process for the purpose of undermining the Trump presidency. The Nunes memo alleged that there was excessive and improper dependence on the Trump–Russia dossier.

On February 3, 2018, Trump praised the Nunes memo and tweeted:

Donald J. Trump✓ via Twitter @realDonaldTrump

This memo totally vindicates "Trump" in probe. But the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on. Their was no Collusion and there was no Obstruction (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead). This is an American disgrace!

February 3, 2018

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) disagreed, stating on February 4 on CBS's Face the Nation: "I actually don't think has any impact on the Russia probe." He went on to say:

"There is a Russia investigation without a dossier," Gowdy said. "So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos' meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there's going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier."

Glenn Kessler, a fact checker for The Washington Post, has analyzed a false accusation made by Devin Nunes in a February 7, 2018, interview on the Hugh Hewitt Show: "The truth is that they are covering up that Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to get dirt on Trump to feed it to the FBI to open up an investigation into the other campaign." Kessler's "Pinocchio Test" rating was: "here is no evidence that Clinton was involved in Steele's reports or worked with Russian entities to feed information to Steele. That's where Nunes's claim goes off the rails—and why he earns Four Pinocchios." "Four Pinocchios" equals a "Whopper".

Reactions November 14, 2017 – House Intelligence Committee transcript of Glenn Simpson Wikisource has original text related to this article: House Intelligence Committee Interview of Glenn Simpson Transcript August 22, 2017 Fusion GPS testimony transcript of Glenn Simpson Wikisource has original text related to this article: Senate Judiciary Committee Interview of Glenn Simpson Individual responses

Donald Trump called the dossier "fake news" and criticized the intelligence and media sources that published it. During a press conference on January 11, 2017, Trump denounced the dossier's claims as false, saying that it was "disgraceful" for U.S. intelligence agencies to report them. Trump refused to answer a question from CNN's senior White House correspondent Jim Acosta on the subject. In response, CNN said that it had published "carefully sourced reporting" on the matter which had been "matched by the other major news organizations", as opposed to BuzzFeed's posting of "unsubstantiated materials".

James Clapper described the leaks as damaging to U.S. national security. This contradicted Trump's previous claim that Clapper had said the information was false; Clapper's statement actually said the intelligence community had made no judgment on the truth of the information.

As Putin's press secretary, Peskov insisted in an interview that the dossier is a fraud, saying "I can assure you that the allegations in this funny paper, in this so-called report, they are untrue. They are all fake." Putin called the people who leaked the dossier "worse than prostitutes" and referred to the dossier itself as "rubbish". Putin went on to state he believed that the dossier was "clearly fake", fabricated as a plot against the legitimacy of President-elect Trump.

Some of Steele's former colleagues expressed support for his character, saying "The idea his work is fake or a cowboy operation is false—completely untrue. Chris is an experienced and highly regarded professional. He's not the sort of person who will simply pass on gossip."

Among journalists, Bob Woodward called the dossier a "garbage document", while Carl Bernstein took the opposite view, noting that the senior-most U.S. intelligence officials had determined that the content was worth reporting to the president and the president-elect. Julian Borger has described the dossier as "one of the most explosive documents in modern political history..." Ben Smith, editor of BuzzFeed, wrote: "The dossier is a document...of obvious central public importance. It's the subject of multiple investigations by intelligence agencies, by Congress. That was clear a year ago. It's a lot clearer now."

Ynet, an Israeli online news site, reported on January 12, 2017 that U.S. intelligence advised Israeli intelligence officers to be cautious about sharing information with the incoming Trump administration, until the possibility of Russian influence over Trump, suggested by Steele's report, has been fully investigated.

On March 2, 2017, media began reporting that the Senate may call Steele to testify about the Trump dossier. On March 27, 2017, SJC Chairman Chuck Grassley asked the Department of Justice to initiate an inquiry into Fusion GPS, who initially retained Steele to write the dossier. Fusion GPS was previously associated with pro-Russia lobbying activities due to sanctions imposed by the Magnitsky Act. On August 22, 2017, Steele met with the FBI and had provided them with the names of his sources for the allegations in the dossier.

Steven L. Hall, former CIA chief of Russia operations, has contrasted Steele's methods with those of Donald Trump Jr., who sought information from a Russian attorney at a meeting in Trump Tower in June 2016: "The distinction: Steele spied against Russia to get info Russia did not want released; Don Jr took a mtg to get info Russians wanted to give."

Jane Mayer referred to the same meeting and contrasted the difference in reactions to Russian attempts to support Trump: When Trump Jr. was offered "dirt" on Clinton as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump," instead of "going to the F.B.I., as Steele had" done when he learned that Russia was helping Trump, Trump's son accepted the support by responding: "If it's what you say, I love it..."

On January 2, 2018, Simpson and Fritsch authored an op-ed in The New York Times, requesting that Republicans "release full transcripts of our firm's testimony" and further wrote that, "the Steele dossier was not the trigger for the F.B.I.'s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp." Ken Dilanian of NBC News stated that a "source close to Fusion GPS" told him that the FBI had not planted anyone in the Trump camp, but rather that Simpson was referring to Papadopoulos.

On January 5, 2018, in the first known Congressional criminal referral resulting from investigations related to the Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, Grassley made a referral to the Justice Department suggesting that they investigate possible criminal charges against Steele for allegedly making false statements to the FBI about the distribution of the dossier's claims, specifically possible "inconsistencies" in what Steele told authorities and "possibly lying to FBI officials". Senator Lindsey Graham also signed the letter. Both Grassley and Graham declared that they were not alleging that Steele "had committed any crime. Rather, they had passed on the information for 'further investigation only'." The referral was met with skepticism from legal experts, as well as some of the other Republicans and Democrats on the Judiciary committee, who reportedly had not been consulted.

On January 8, 2018, a spokesman for Grassley said he did not plan to release the transcript of Simpson's August 22, 2017 testimony before the SJC. The next day, ranking committee member Senator Dianne Feinstein unilaterally released the transcript.

On January 18, 2018, the HPSCI released the transcript of the Simpson Testimony given on November 14, 2017. Democratic committee member Adam Schiff stated that the testimony contains "serious allegations that The Trump Organization may have engaged in money laundering with Russian nationals". Trump Organization's chief counsel Alan Garten called the allegations "unsubstantiated" and "reckless", and said that Simpson was mainly referring to properties to which Trump licensed his name. Democratic member Jim Himes said that Simpson "did not provide evidence and I think that's an important point. He made allegations."

In April 2018, the White House Correspondents' Association bestowed The Merriman Smith Memorial Award to Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, Jake Tapper and Carl Bernstein of CNN for their reporting "that Russia had compromising information about" then-President elect Donald Trump, and noted that "hanks to this CNN investigation, 'the dossier' is now part of the lexicon".

Suspicious death of Oleg Erovinkin

On December 26, 2016, Oleg Erovinkin, a former KGB/FSB general, was found dead in his car in Moscow. Erovinkin was a key liaison between Sechin and Putin. Steele claimed much of the information came from a source close to Sechin. According to Christo Grozev, a journalist at Risk Management Lab, a think tank based in Bulgaria, the circumstances of Erovinkin's death were "mysterious". Grozev suspected Erovinkin helped Steele compile the dossier on Trump and suggests the hypothesis that the death may have been part of a cover-up by the Russian government. Mark Galeotti, senior research fellow at the Institute of International Relations Prague, who specializes in Russian history and security, rejected Grozev's hypothesis. According to Harding, Steele denied that Erovinkin was his direct source, but "the information could nonetheless have originated with Erovinkin" and he would be held responsible for the leak as one of the heads of Rosneft's administration in charge of security.

Litigation against BuzzFeed

On February 3, 2017, Aleksej Gubarev, chief of technology company XBT and a figure mentioned in the dossier, sued BuzzFeed for defamation. The suit, filed in a Broward County, Florida court, centers on allegations from the dossier that XBT had been "using botnets and porn traffic to transmit viruses, plant bugs, steal data and conduct 'altering operations' against the Democratic Party leadership". In the High Court of Justice, Steele's lawyers said their client did not intend for the memos to be released, and that one of the memos "needed to be analyzed and further investigated/verified". In response to the lawsuit, BuzzFeed hired the business advisory firm FTI Consulting to investigate the dossier's allegations. BuzzFeed has sued the DNC in an attempt to force the disclosure of information it believes will bolster its defense against libel allegations. Fusion GPS "has claimed that it did not provide the dossier to BuzzFeed."

On January 9, 2018, it was reported that Cohen sued BuzzFeed for defamation over allegations about him in the dossier, which BuzzFeed had published a year before.

Reactions to specific allegations Allegation of collusion with Russia

Frida Ghitis, writing in Foreign Policy magazine, commented: "The most important question the dossier raises is whether Trump colluded with Russia in its interference in the U.S. presidential election. That is crucial not just because it might constitute treason, but because if it did occur, that alone would amount to kompromat. Forget the prostitutes. If Trump and the Kremlin worked together, that fact alone gives Putin something with which to pressure Trump to act in Russia's interest."

See also
  • Cyberwarfare by Russia
  • Foreign electoral intervention
  • Russian espionage in the United States
  • The Plot to Hack America
  • Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
  • Trump: The Kremlin Candidate?
References
  1. ^ a b Vogel, Kenneth P.; Haberman, Maggie (October 27, 2017). "Conservative Website First Funded Anti-Trump Research by Firm That Later Produced Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Shane, Scott; Confessore, Nicholas; Rosenberg, Matthew (January 12, 2017). "How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f Sumter, Kyler (November 16, 2017). "The five most interesting claims in the Donald Trump dossier". The Week. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  4. ^ Bensinger, Ken; Elder, Miriam; Schoofs, Mark (January 10, 2017). "These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia". BuzzFeed. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  5. ^ Bump, Philip (January 11, 2017). "BuzzFeed, the Russia dossier and the problem of too much information". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 29, 2017. 
  6. ^ Zurawik, David (January 11, 2017). "BuzzFeed undermines all journalists with Trump 'dossier'". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 10, 2018. 
  7. ^ a b Entous, Adam; Barrett, Devlin; Helderman, Rosalind (October 24, 2017). "Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 25, 2017. 
  8. ^ a b Sampathkumar, Mythili (August 23, 2017). "Trump–Russia dossier sources revealed to the FBI by Christopher Steele". The Independent. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  9. ^ a b c Perez, Evan; Prokupecz, Shimon; Raju, Manu (April 18, 2017). "FBI used dossier allegations to bolster Trump–Russia investigation". CNN. Retrieved April 19, 2017. 
  10. ^ Beavers, Olivia (December 27, 2017). "House Intel panel subpoenas McCain associate over Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved January 10, 2018. Certain parts of the dossier have either been confirmed or proven false, while other parts of the memo compilation remain unverified. 
  11. ^ Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (December 26, 2017). "Trump slams FBI, Obamacare in post-Christmas tweets". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 11, 2018. Officials have said some of the information it contains has been corroborated, but other parts—including the most salacious claims about Trump's behavior—remain unverified. 
  12. ^ a b c Berke, Jeremy (June 8, 2017). "Comey's cryptic answer about the infamous Trump dossier makes it look likely it could be verified". Business Insider. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  13. ^ a b Sciutto, Jim; Perez, Evan (February 10, 2017). "US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier". CNN. Retrieved February 10, 2017. 
  14. ^ a b c Borger, Julian (January 11, 2017). "John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI". The Guardian. Retrieved February 26, 2018. 
  15. ^ Lima, Cristiano (October 27, 2017). "Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier". Politico. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  16. ^ Johnson, Jenna (May 4, 2016). "The night Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 10, 2018. 
  17. ^ a b Borger, Julian (January 12, 2017). "How the Trump dossier came to light: secret sources, a retired spy and John McCain". The Guardian. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  18. ^ a b c d Robertson, Lori (February 7, 2018). "Q&A on the Nunes Memo". FactCheck.org. Retrieved February 12, 2018. 
  19. ^ Tucker, Eric; Jalonick, Clare; Day, Chad (February 3, 2018). "Correction: Trump-Russia Probe story". AP News. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  20. ^ Continetti, Matthew; Goldfarb, Michael (October 27, 2017). "Fusion GPS and the Washington Free Beacon". The Washington Free Beacon. Retrieved February 25, 2018. All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign. 
  21. ^ Johnson, Kevin; Kelly, Erin (January 9, 2018). "Dossier author was told FBI had a source inside Trump Organization". USA Today. Retrieved January 10, 2018. 
  22. ^ Hosenball, Mark (November 1, 2017). "Ex-British spy paid $168,000 for Trump dossier, U.S. firm discloses". Reuters. Retrieved November 7, 2017. 
  23. ^ a b c d e f g h i Borger, Julian (April 28, 2017). "UK was given details of alleged contacts between Trump campaign and Moscow". The Guardian. Retrieved December 26, 2017. 
  24. ^ a b Flegenheimer, Matt (January 8, 2018). "Fusion GPS Founder Hauled From the Shadows for the Russia Election Investigation". The New York Times. Retrieved March 25, 2018. 
  25. ^ a b c Borger, Julian (November 15, 2017). "Christopher Steele believes his dossier on Trump-Russia is 70-90% accurate". The Guardian. Retrieved January 22, 2018. 
  26. ^ Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn (November 16, 2017). "Fusion GPS co-founder: Steele didn't pay sources for dossier on Trump". CNN. Retrieved November 19, 2017. 
  27. ^ a b c Simpson, Glenn R.; Fritsch, Peter (January 2, 2018). "The Republicans' Fake investigations". The New York Times. Retrieved January 3, 2018. 
  28. ^ Williams, Katie Bo; Beavers, Olivia (January 18, 2018). "'Steele dossier' firm suspected Trump-Russia money laundering". The Hill. Retrieved April 12, 2018. 
  29. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Mayer, Jane (March 12, 2018). "Christopher Steele, the Man Behind the Trump Dossier". The New Yorker. Retrieved March 6, 2018. 
  30. ^ a b NPR (November 21, 2017). "Journalist Investigating Trump And Russia Says 'Full Picture Is One Of Collusion'". NPR. Retrieved February 17, 2018. 
  31. ^ a b c Blum, Howard (March 30, 2017). "How Ex-Spy Christopher Steele Compiled His Explosive Trump-Russia Dossier". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  32. ^ a b c d Corn, David (October 31, 2016). "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump". Mother Jones. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  33. ^ a b c d e Levine, Mike (January 12, 2018). "FBI vets: What many are missing about the infamous 'dossier' amid Russia probe". ABC News. Retrieved February 26, 2018. Chris said he was very concerned about whether this represented a national security threat and said ... he thought we were obligated to tell someone in government, in our government about this information," Glenn Simpson, the man who hired Steele to conduct opposition research on Trump, told Senate staffers in a transcript released Tuesday. "He said he was professionally obligated to do it. 
  34. ^ a b c Sengupta, Kim (January 13, 2017). "Ex-MI6 agent so worried by his Donald Trump discoveries he started working without pay". The Independent. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  35. ^ a b Herb, Jeremy; Raju, Manu; Cohen, Marshall (January 10, 2018). "Fusion co-founder: Dossier author feared Trump was being blackmailed". CNN. Retrieved January 21, 2018. Chris said he was very concerned about whether this represented a national security threat and said he wanted to -- he said he thought we were obligated to tell someone in government, in our government about this information," Simpson said. "He thought from his perspective there was an issue -- a security issue about whether a presidential candidate was being blackmailed." 
  36. ^ Kessler, Glenn (January 9, 2018). "What you need to know about Christopher Steele, the FBI and the Trump 'dossier'". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 22, 2018. 
  37. ^ a b Hamburger, Tom; Helderman, Rosalind S. (February 28, 2017). "FBI once planned to pay former British spy who authored controversial Trump dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 1, 2017. 
  38. ^ Kiely, Eugene (February 27, 2018). "Trump's Spin on Democratic Memo". FactCheck.org. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  39. ^ a b Jalonick, Mary (January 9, 2018). "Democratic report warns of Russian meddling in Europe, US". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 22, 2018. 
  40. ^ Ember, Sydney; Grynbaum, Michael M. (January 10, 2017). "BuzzFeed Posts Unverified Claims on Trump, Igniting a Debate". The New York Times. Retrieved April 2, 2018. 
  41. ^ a b Edwards, Jim (January 11, 2017). "TIMELINE: That Russian Trump blackmail dossier has been making the rounds for months - here is how it finally came to light". Business Insider. Retrieved April 7, 2018. 
  42. ^ Sengupta, Kim (January 12, 2017). "Former British ambassador played key role in leaked Trump documents". The Independent. Retrieved April 7, 2018. 
  43. ^ a b c d e f g Harding, Luke (May 10, 2017). "What do we know about alleged links between Trump and Russia?". The Guardian. Retrieved December 26, 2017. 
  44. ^ a b c Cormier, Anthony (May 5, 2017). "This Is The Inside Of Trump's Lawyer's Passport". BuzzFeed. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  45. ^ a b Kosoff, Maya (July 20, 2017). "Trump Thinks Comey Was Trying to Blackmail Him". Vanity Fair. Retrieved April 7, 2018. 
  46. ^ a b Hensch, Mark (January 12, 2017). "Biden: Intel officials warned us of Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved February 1, 2017. 
  47. ^ Nowicki, Dan (January 13, 2017). "John McCain intrigue grows in Donald Trump dossier affair". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  48. ^ AOL (January 12, 2017). "Biden: Obama and I were told about Trump dossier ahead of leaks". AOL. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  49. ^ a b c Perez, Evan; Sciutto, Jim; Tapper, Jake; Bernstein, Carl (January 10, 2017). "Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him". CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2018. 
  50. ^ Wemple, Erik (January 11, 2017). "BuzzFeed's ridiculous rationale for publishing the Trump-Russia dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  51. ^ a b Sutton, Kelsey (January 11, 2017). "Trump calls CNN 'fake news', as channel defends its reporting on intelligence briefing". Politico. Retrieved January 11, 2017. 
  52. ^ a b c Stein, Jeff (January 10, 2017). "Trump, Russian spies and the infamous 'golden shower memos'". Newsweek. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  53. ^ Mak, Tim; Suebsaeng, Asawin; Weiss, Michael (January 10, 2017). "U.S. Spies Warn Trump and GOP: Russia Could Get You Next". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 11, 2017. 
  54. ^ Shane, Scott; Goldman, Adam; Rosenberg, Matthew (January 10, 2017). "Trump Received Unsubstantiated Report That Russia Had Damaging Information About Him". The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2017. 
  55. ^ Sullivan, Margaret (January 11, 2017). "How BuzzFeed crossed the line in publishing salacious 'dossier' on Trump". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 31, 2017. 
  56. ^ Smith, Ben (January 23, 2017). "Why BuzzFeed News Published the Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2017. 
  57. ^ Graham, David A. (January 11, 2017). "The Trouble With Publishing the Trump Dossier". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 10, 2018. 
  58. ^ a b Nichols, Hans; Dilanian, Ken (January 11, 2017). "Former British Spy Christopher Steele Prepared Explosive Trump Memo". NBC News. Retrieved January 12, 2017. 
  59. ^ Guardian Staff (January 12, 2017). "Christopher Steele, ex-MI6 officer, named as author of Trump dossier". The Guardian. Retrieved January 18, 2017. 
  60. ^ Wood, Paul (January 12, 2017). "Trump memos ex-MI6 man 'in hiding'". BBC News. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  61. ^ a b Hope, Bradley; Rothfeld, Michael; Cullison, Alan (January 11, 2017). "Christopher Steele, Ex-British Intelligence Officer, Said to Have Prepared Dossier on Trump". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 18, 2017. 
  62. ^ Withnall, Adam (March 7, 2017). "Ex-British spy Christopher Steele breaks silence over Trump Russia dossier". The Independent. Retrieved March 26, 2017. 
  63. ^ Hughes, Chris; Robson, Steve (January 12, 2017). "First picture of British spy behind Donald Trump 'dirty dossier' revealed". Daily Mirror. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  64. ^ Neubert, Michele; Dilanian, Ken; Vinograd, Cassandra; Connor, Tracy (January 13, 2017). "The ex-spy who wrote the Trump dossier is nicknamed James Bond". NBC News. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  65. ^ Behar, Richard (January 11, 2017). "Could This Be The British Ex-MI6 Agent Behind The Trump FBI Memos?". Forbes. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  66. ^ Harding, Luke; Hopkins, Nick (January 13, 2017). "UK's former Moscow ambassador in spotlight over Trump dossier". The Guardian. Retrieved January 18, 2017. 
  67. ^ a b c Hamburger, Tom; Helderman, Rosalind S. (February 6, 2018). "Hero or hired gun? How a British former spy became a flash point in the Russia investigation". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 10, 2018. 
  68. ^ Breuninger, Kevin (January 13, 2018). "Fusion GPS testimony on infamous dossier shines new light on Trump's perilous financial ties". CNBC. Retrieved January 18, 2018. 
  69. ^ Stefansky, Emma (November 11, 2017). "Trump: I Believe Putin "Means It" When He Denies Election Meddling". Vanity Fair. Retrieved January 25, 2018. 
  70. ^ Harding, Luke (November 15, 2017). "How Trump walked into Putin's web". The Guardian. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  71. ^ a b c Price, Greg (December 21, 2017). "What's True in the Trump 'Golden Shower' Dossier? Salacious Report Dogged President Throughout 2017". Newsweek. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  72. ^ a b LeTourneau, Nancy (January 13, 2017). "How Trump and the Russians sowed discord on the left". Washington Monthly. Retrieved February 27, 2018. 
  73. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Withnall, Adam; Sengupta, Kim (January 12, 2017). "The 10 key Donald Trump allegations from the classified Russia memos". The Independent. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  74. ^ a b c d e f g Weindling, Jacob (January 11, 2017). "The 31 Most Explosive Allegations against Trump from the Leaked Intelligence Document". Paste. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  75. ^ Drum, Kevin (January 11, 2017). "US Intelligence: Evidence of Trump-Russia Ties Might Be Credible". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 25, 2017. 
  76. ^ a b Harding, Luke (January 11, 2017). "What we know – and what's true – about the Trump-Russia dossier". The Guardian. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  77. ^ a b Beauchamp, Zack (March 22, 2017). "What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign". Vox. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  78. ^ a b c Wood, Paul (March 30, 2017). "Trump Russia dossier key claim 'verified'". BBC News. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  79. ^ a b Paul, David (January 18, 2017). "Golden Shower or No, Donald Trump Looks to be a Gift Beyond Vladimir Putin's Wildest Dreams". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 28, 2018. 
  80. ^ a b c d Bertrand, Natasha (January 15, 2017). "Explosive memos suggest that a Trump-Russia quid pro quo was at the heart of the GOP's dramatic shift on Ukraine". Business Insider. Retrieved January 20, 2018. 
  81. ^ a b c d e f g Borger, Julian (October 7, 2017). "The Trump-Russia dossier: why its findings grow more significant by the day". The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2017. 
  82. ^ a b c d Yglesias, Matthew; Prokop, Andrew (February 2, 2018). "The Steele dossier on Trump and Russia, explained". Vox. Retrieved January 15, 2018. 
  83. ^ Sipher, John (September 11, 2017). "A lot of the Steele dossier has since been corroborated". Slate. Retrieved February 17, 2018. 
  84. ^ a b c Garossino, Sandy (January 14, 2017). "Trump's Ill-Gotten Victory: Intel dossier says Putin helped Sanders, Stein". National Observer. Retrieved February 27, 2018. 
  85. ^ a b c Sipher, John (September 6, 2017). "What exactly does the Steele dirty Russian dossier on Trump contain?". Newsweek. Retrieved January 20, 2018. 
  86. ^ a b c Parfitt, Tom (January 12, 2017). "Putin spies 'taped Trump sex game with prostitutes'". The Sunday Times. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  87. ^ a b c Bertrand, Natasha (November 10, 2017). "Trump's bodyguard's testimony raises new questions about the most salacious allegations in the dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved January 14, 2018. 
  88. ^ Zappone, Chris (January 11, 2017). "Russia planned to cultivate and compromise Donald Trump, according to leaked memos". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved February 27, 2018. 
  89. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (January 10, 2017). "Trump briefed on unverified claims that Russian operatives have compromising information on him". Business Insider. Retrieved February 26, 2018. 
  90. ^ a b c Harding, Luke (2017). Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win. Vintage. ISBN 978-0525562511. 
  91. ^ LeTourneau, Nancy (February 17, 2017). "Trump is configuring a dangerous web of foreign interests". Washington Monthly. Retrieved February 17, 2018. 
  92. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (November 17, 2017). "Kushner received emails from Sergei Millian - an alleged dossier source who was in touch with George Papadopoulos". Business Insider. Retrieved December 24, 2017. 
  93. ^ a b c d Bertrand, Natasha (October 6, 2017). "Mueller reportedly interviewed the author of the Trump-Russia dossier - here's what it alleges, and how it aligned with reality". Business Insider. Retrieved January 18, 2018. 
  94. ^ a b Stone, Peter; Gordon, Greg (April 13, 2018). "Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier". McClatchyDC. Retrieved April 13, 2018. 
  95. ^ a b Gray, Rosie (January 10, 2017). "Michael Cohen: 'It Is Fake News Meant to Malign Mr. Trump'". The Atlantic. Retrieved December 24, 2017. I'm telling you emphatically that I've not been to Prague, I've never been to Czech , I've not been to Russia. 
  96. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (November 6, 2017). "Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells - and supports key portions of the Steele dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  97. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (January 27, 2017). "Memos: CEO of Russia's state oil company offered Trump adviser, allies a cut of huge deal if sanctions were lifted". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  98. ^ a b Tracy, Abigail (November 7, 2017). "Is Carter Page Digging the Trump Administration's Grave? Three things the former campaign adviser revealed to Congress that should scare the White House". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  99. ^ Hall, Kevin G.; Stone, Peter; Gordon, Greg (February 15, 2017). "Russian diplomat under U.S. scrutiny in election meddling speaks". McClatchyDC. Retrieved April 9, 2018. 
  100. ^ Drum, Kevin (March 30, 2017). "The Trump "Dossier" Is Looking More Credible All the Time". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 23, 2018. 
  101. ^ a b Bertrand, Natasha (February 11, 2017). "The timeline of Trump's ties with Russia lines up with allegations of conspiracy and misconduct". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  102. ^ Harding, Luke (November 19, 2017). "The Hidden History of Trump's First Trip to Moscow". Politico. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  103. ^ RFE/RL (January 11, 2017). "Report: Czech Intelligence Says No Evidence Trump Lawyer Traveled To Prague". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved January 19, 2018. According to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 'A Czech intelligence source told the Respekt magazine that there is no record of Cohen arriving in Prague by plane, although the news weekly pointed out he could have traveled by car or train from a nearby EU country, avoiding passport control under Schengen zone travel rules.' 
  104. ^ Meyer, Josh (December 6, 2017). "Investigators probe European travel of Trump associates". Politico. Retrieved February 27, 2018. 
  105. ^ CBS News (April 14, 2018). "Trump lawyer Michael Cohen denies traveling to Prague". CBS News. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  106. ^ Cohen, Michael (April 14, 2018). "Michael Cohen on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved April 14, 2018. 
  107. ^ a b Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn (November 8, 2017). "Carter Page reveals new contacts with Trump campaign, Russians". CNN. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  108. ^ a b Lanktree, Graham (November 7, 2017). "Carter Page Attacked Christopher Steele's Trump Dossier But His Testimony Raised Questions Over Russian Meetings". Newsweek. Retrieved April 2, 2018. 
  109. ^ a b Kelly, Erin (November 6, 2017). "Trump campaign adviser Carter Page acknowledges meeting with senior Russian officials: transcript". USA Today. Retrieved April 2, 2018. 
  110. ^ Francis, David; Groll, Elias (June 7, 2017). "Comey: Trump Denied He Was Involved With 'Hookers' in Russia". Foreign Policy. Retrieved January 25, 2018. 
  111. ^ Stracqualursi, Veronica (April 13, 2018). "Comey: 'I don't know' if Trump was with prostitutes in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  112. ^ McCarthy, Tom (April 13, 2018). "'Slime ball': Trump attacks Comey after new book likens president to mafia boss". The Guardian. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  113. ^ Chiacu, Doina; Moore, Angela (April 14, 2018). "Trump, called an unethical liar in book, blasts ex-FBI chief as 'slime ball'". Reuters. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  114. ^ a b Chait, Jonathan (April 13, 2018). "I'm a Peeliever and You Should Be, Too. 5 Reasons the Pee Tape Is Probably Real". New York. Retrieved April 16, 2018. 
  115. ^ Corn, David; Isikoff, Michael (March 8, 2018). "What Happened in Moscow: The Inside Story of How Trump's Obsession With Putin Began". Mother Jones. Retrieved April 15, 2018. 
  116. ^ Silver, Vernon; Pismennaya, Evgenia (July 13, 2017). "Trump's Two Nights of Parties in Moscow Echo Years Later". Bloomberg News. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  117. ^ Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy (November 10, 2017). "Ex-Trump security chief testifies he rejected 2013 Russian offer of women for Trump in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved January 26, 2018. 
  118. ^ Dilanian, Ken; Allen, Jonathan (November 9, 2017). "Trump Bodyguard Keith Schiller Testifies Russian Offered Trump Women, Was Turned Down". NBC News. Retrieved February 28, 2018. 
  119. ^ a b Lange, Jeva (January 11, 2017). "BBC claims a second source backs up Trump dossier". The Week. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  120. ^ Wood, Paul (January 12, 2017). "Trump 'compromising' claims: How and why did we get here?". BBC News. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  121. ^ Drum, Kevin (January 12, 2017). "BBC's Paul Wood: There are four sources for claims of possible Trump–Russia blackmail". Mother Jones. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  122. ^ a b Tracy, Abigail (January 11, 2017). "What Intelligence Experts Think of the Explosive Trump–Russia Report". Vanity Fair. Retrieved July 31, 2017. 
  123. ^ a b Hennessey, Susan; Wittes, Benjamin (January 12, 2017). "Why Are the Trump Allegations Hanging Around When They Haven't Been Substantiated?". Lawfare. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  124. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (March 30, 2017). "The FBI is reportedly using the explosive Trump–Russia dossier as a 'roadmap' for its investigation". Business Insider. Retrieved April 19, 2017. 
  125. ^ Hosenball, Mark; Landay, Jonathan (October 11, 2017). "U.S. congressional panels spar over 'Trump dossier' on Russia contacts". Reuters. Retrieved December 29, 2017. 
  126. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (October 27, 2017). "Former intel official: Trump–Russia dossier 'played no role' in our analysis of Russian meddling". Business Insider. Retrieved October 29, 2017. 
  127. ^ Chait, Jonathan (December 7, 2017). "The Steele Dossier on Trump and Russia Is Looking More and More Real". New York. Retrieved December 28, 2017. 
  128. ^ Lederman, Josh (January 12, 2017). "Biden: Intel officials told us Trump allegations might leak". Associated Press. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  129. ^ Matthews, Owen (January 11, 2017). "Thirteen things that don't add up in the Russia-Trump intelligence dossier". Newsweek. Retrieved February 1, 2017. 
  130. ^ Sky News (January 13, 2017). "Trump dossier 'shaky' – former British envoy". Sky News. Retrieved February 28, 2017. A former ambassador to Moscow casts doubts over elements of the report, as friends of the UK spy behind it leap to his defence. 
  131. ^ Comey, James (June 8, 2017). "James Comey's prepared testimony". CNN. Retrieved January 1, 2018. 
  132. ^ ODNI (January 6, 2017). Background to 'Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections': The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution (PDF) (Report). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  133. ^ Gillette, Robert (January 27, 2017). "My Turn: Inside the Trump dossier". Concord Monitor. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  134. ^ Kelly, Meg (November 13, 2017). "All the known times the Trump campaign met with Russians". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 6, 2018. 
  135. ^ a b c LaFraniere, Sharon; Mazzetti, Mark; Apuzzo, Matt (December 30, 2017). "How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt". The New York Times. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  136. ^ Helderman, Rosalind S. (November 2, 2017). "Who's who in the George Papadopoulos court documents". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  137. ^ Winter, Tom; Connor, Tracy; Dilanian, Ken; Ainsley, Julia (October 30, 2017). "Secret Guilty Plea of Ex-Trump Campaign Adviser George Papadopoulos Reveals Russian Ties". NBC News. Retrieved October 30, 2017. 
  138. ^ Apuzzo, Matt; Schmidt, Michael S. (October 30, 2017). "Trump Campaign Adviser Met With Russian to Discuss 'Dirt' on Clinton". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  139. ^ CNN Staff (July 15, 2017). "Trump Tower Russia meeting: At least eight people in the room". CNN. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  140. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (August 31, 2017). "Manafort's notes from the Trump Tower Russia meeting reportedly mention political contributions and the RNC". Yahoo! Finance. Retrieved September 1, 2017. 
  141. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (September 22, 2017). "Former Trump adviser: I gave the campaign 'the chance to intervene' in controversial Ukraine platform change". Business Insider. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  142. ^ Johnson, Carrie (December 4, 2017). "2016 RNC Delegate: Trump Directed Change To Party Platform On Ukraine Support". NPR. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  143. ^ Murray, Sara; Acosta, Jim; Schleifer, Theodore (March 4, 2017). "More Trump advisers disclose meetings with Russia's ambassador". CNN. Retrieved April 10, 2017. 
  144. ^ Mak, Tim; Corse, Alexa (August 3, 2016). "Trump Campaign Changed Ukraine Platform, Lied About It". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  145. ^ Crowley, Michael (August 3, 2016). "Trump changed views on Ukraine after hiring Manafort". Politico. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  146. ^ a b Stevenson, Aiko (January 18, 2017). "President Trump: The Manchurian Candidate?". The Huffington Post. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  147. ^ Stein, Jeff (December 21, 2017). "Putin's Man in the White House? Real Trump Russia Scandal is Not Mere Collusion, U.S. Counterspies Say". Newsweek. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  148. ^ Miller, Greg; Entous, Adam; Nakashima, Ellen (February 10, 2017). "National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  149. ^ a b Isikoff, Michael (June 1, 2017). "How the Trump administration's secret efforts to ease Russia sanctions fell short". Yahoo! News. Retrieved March 4, 2018. 
  150. ^ Dilanian, Ken (June 1, 2017). "Former Diplomats: Trump Team Sought to Lift Sanctions on Russia". NBC News. Retrieved March 4, 2018. 
  151. ^ Porter, Tom (January 30, 2018). "Trump refuses to impose new sanctions on Russia". Newsweek. Retrieved March 4, 2018. 
  152. ^ Hall, Kevin G; Stone, Peter; Gordon, Greg; Goldstein, David (February 15, 2017). "Russian diplomat under U.S. scrutiny in election meddling speaks". McClatchyDC. Retrieved January 27, 2018. 
  153. ^ Maza, Cristina (January 10, 2018). "How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims". Newsweek. Retrieved 9 April 2018. 
  154. ^ Shuster, Simon (July 25, 2016). "Why Putin Has an Electoral Bone to Pick With Hillary Clinton". Time. Retrieved March 7, 2018. 
  155. ^ a b Entous, Adam; Nakashima, Ellen; Miller, Greg (December 9, 2016). "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 7, 2018. 
  156. ^ a b Hart, Benjamin (December 30, 2017). "Report: Papadopoulos, Not Dossier, Sparked Russia Investigation". New York. Retrieved December 31, 2017. 
  157. ^ a b Bertrand, Natasha (October 5, 2017). "Congressional and FBI investigators are homing in on the Trump–Russia dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved November 6, 2017. 
  158. ^ Perez, Evan; Prokupecz, Shimon; Brown, Pamela (October 25, 2017). "Mueller's team met with Russia dossier author". CNN. Retrieved November 5, 2017. 
  159. ^ Feldman, Kate (November 2, 2017). "Hillary Clinton defends funding Steele dossier on Trump, Russia". New York Daily News. Retrieved November 6, 2017. 
  160. ^ Parker, Ashley; Helderman, Rosalind S.; Dawsey, Josh; Leonnig, Carol D. (January 27, 2018). "Trump sought release of classified Russia memo, putting him at odds with Justice Department". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 29, 2018. 
  161. ^ Savage, Charlie (January 30, 2018). "The Real Aim of the Nunes Memo Is the Mueller Investigation". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  162. ^ @realDonaldTrump (February 3, 2018). "This memo totally vindicates "Trump" in probe. But the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on. Their was no Collusion and there was no Obstruction (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead). This is an American disgrace!" (Tweet) – via Twitter. 
  163. ^ Kessler, Glenn (February 9, 2018). "Did Hillary Clinton collude with the Russians to get 'dirt' on Trump to feed it to the FBI?". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 12, 2018. 
  164. ^ Kessler, Glenn (September 11, 2013). "About The Fact Checker". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 13, 2018. 
  165. ^ Henderson, Barney; Lawler, David; Burke, Louise (January 12, 2017). "Donald Trump attacks alleged Russian dossier as 'fake news' and slams Buzzfeed and CNN at press conference". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  166. ^ Rascoe, Ayesha (January 11, 2017). "Trump accuses U.S. spy agencies of Nazi practices over 'phony' Russia dossier". Reuters. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  167. ^ Hartmann, Margaret (January 12, 2017). "Clapper Denounces 'Corrosive and Damaging' Trump Dossier Leak". New York. Retrieved January 12, 2017. 
  168. ^ Weisman, Jonathan; Steinhauer, Jennifer (January 12, 2017). "Intelligence Chief's Olive Branch to Trump Gets Twisted in Translation". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  169. ^ Neely, Bill (January 21, 2017). "Kremlin Spokesman: U.S. Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking 'Ridiculous'". NBC News. Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  170. ^ Fox News (January 17, 2017). "Putin: Those who leaked Trump dossier 'worse than prostitutes'". Fox News. Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  171. ^ Dewan, Angela; Veselinovic, Milena (January 17, 2017). "Putin on Trump dossier claims: 'Rubbish'". CNN. Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  172. ^ Macfarquhar, Neil (January 17, 2017). "Putin Says Accusations in Trump Dossier Are 'Clearly Fake'". The New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2017. 
  173. ^ Roth, Andrew; Filipov, David (January 17, 2017). "Russia's Putin rejects Trump dossier report as plot against 'legitimacy' of president-elect". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  174. ^ Harding, Luke; Hopkins, Nick (January 12, 2017). "Donald Trump dossier: intelligence sources vouch for author's credibility". The Guardian. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  175. ^ Fox News (January 16, 2017). "'Garbage Document': Woodward Says US Intel Should Apologize Over Trump Dossier". Fox News. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  176. ^ Greenwood, Max (January 10, 2018). "BuzzFeed editor defends publication of dossier". The Hill. Retrieved March 31, 2018. 
  177. ^ Bergman, Ronen (January 12, 2017). "US intel sources warn Israel against sharing secrets with Trump administration". Ynetnews. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  178. ^ Hunt, Kasie; Dilanian, Ken (March 2, 2017). "The Senate may call Christopher Steele to testify about Trump dossier". NBC News. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  179. ^ Carney, Jordain (March 27, 2017). "Grassley wants details on firm tied to controversial Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved April 16, 2017. 
  180. ^ Arnsdorf, Isaac (March 31, 2017). "Grassley presses Justice Dept. on Russian ties to firm behind Trump dossier". Politico. Retrieved April 16, 2017. 
  181. ^ Ross, Brian; Mosk, Matthew; Schwartz, Rhonda (August 22, 2017). "Glenn Simpson key figure behind million-dollar dossier to face questions". ABC News. Retrieved August 23, 2017. 
  182. ^ Carter, Brandon (October 27, 2017). "CIA's ex-Russia chief: Unlike Steele, Trump Jr. took info Russia wanted to give". The Hill. Retrieved December 27, 2017. 
  183. ^ Shafer, Jack (January 13, 2018). "Week 34: The Dossier Strikes Back". Politico. Retrieved January 21, 2018. 
  184. ^ Stanglin, Doug (January 5, 2018). "GOP senators recommend criminal probe of 'Steele dossier' author". USA Today. Retrieved January 7, 2018. 
  185. ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Rosenberg, Matthew (December 15, 2017). "Republican Senators Raise Possible Charges Against Author of Trump Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved January 6, 2018. Republicans on Friday made the first known congressional criminal referral in connection with the meddling. 
  186. ^ Sheth, Sonam (February 7, 2018). "Congress just declassified a letter that offers critical clues about the Steele dossier and the Nunes memo". Business Insider. Retrieved February 8, 2018. 
  187. ^ Price, Greg (January 5, 2018). "Trump-Russia Dossier Author Should Face Criminal Investigation for Lying to FBI, Top Republicans Recommend". Newsweek. Retrieved February 19, 2018. 
  188. ^ a b Barrett, Devlin; Hamburger, Tom (January 5, 2018). "Senior Republican refers Trump dossier author for possible charges". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 5, 2018. 
  189. ^ Tau, Byron (January 5, 2018). "Senators Ask Justice Department to Open Criminal Probe Into Trump Dossier Author". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 5, 2018. 
  190. ^ BBC (January 5, 2018). "Senators urge Trump dossier author probe". BBC News. Retrieved January 7, 2018. 
  191. ^ Dennis, Steven T. (January 8, 2017). "Grassley Won't Release Fusion GPS Transcript From Russia Probe". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 9, 2018. 
  192. ^ Cheney, Kyle (January 9, 2018). "Feinstein releases transcript of interview with Fusion GPS co-founder". Politico. Retrieved January 9, 2018. 
  193. ^ Barrett, Devlin; Hamburger, Tom (January 9, 2018). "Fusion GPS founder told Senate investigators the FBI had a whistleblower in Trump's network". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 9, 2018. 
  194. ^ Chamberlain, Samuel (January 18, 2018). "House panel releases Glenn Simpson testimony transcript". Fox News. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  195. ^ Singman, Brooke (January 18, 2018). "House Intelligence Committee votes to release transcript of interview with Fusion GPS boss". Fox News. Retrieved January 19, 2018. 
  196. ^ Landay, Jonathan; Strobel, Warren (January 18, 2018). "Possible money laundering alleged in sales of Trump properties: Rep. Schiff". Reuters. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  197. ^ WHCA (April 2, 2018). "White House Correspondents' Association, journalism awards for 2018". White House Correspondents' Association. Retrieved April 3, 2018. 
  198. ^ a b Mendick, Robert; Verkaik, Robert (January 27, 2017). "Mystery death of ex-KGB chief linked to MI6 spy's dossier on Donald Trump". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved January 31, 2017. 
  199. ^ Zois, Chris (January 28, 2017). "Russians suspected of aiding investigations into hacking are being arrested and possibly murdered". AOL. Retrieved January 31, 2017. 
  200. ^ Durand, Corentin (January 30, 2017). "Oleg Erovinkin, l'espion russe qui en aurait trop dit sur Trump et la Russie". Numerama (in French). Retrieved July 31, 2017. 
  201. ^ Knight, Amy (January 23, 2018). "Was This Russian General Murdered Over the Steele Dossier?". The Daily Beast. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  202. ^ Goldstein, David; Hall, Kevin G.; Gordon, Greg (February 3, 2017). "BuzzFeed sued over its publication of uncorroborated Trump dossier". McClatchyDC. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  203. ^ Rosenberg, Eli (February 4, 2017). "Russian Executive Sues BuzzFeed Over Unverified Trump Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2018. 
  204. ^ Cohen, Marshall (May 2, 2017). "Spy behind Trump dossier says info was never meant for public eyes". CNN. Retrieved May 3, 2017. 
  205. ^ Winter, Jana (February 12, 2018). "Former Senior FBI Official Is Leading BuzzFeed's Effort to Verify Trump Dossier". Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 13, 2018. 
  206. ^ Pompeo, Joe (February 13, 2018). "BuzzFeed Is Suing the D.N.C. Over Issues Involving the Russia Dossier". Vanity Fair. Retrieved February 14, 2018. Now, BuzzFeed is taking the Democratic National Committee to court in an attempt to compel it to turn over information it believes will bolster its defense against Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian business magnate who says he was libeled in the dossier when it tied him to the Russians' alleged hacking of the D.N.C.'s e-mail servers. In a nutshell: BuzzFeed believes the D.N.C. has information that could show a link between Gubarev and the e-mail hacking, which would undercut his libel claim. 
  207. ^ MSN (October 11, 2017). "Trump-Russia Dossier Plot Thickens". MSN. Retrieved March 31, 2018. 
  208. ^ Jacobs, Jennifer (January 9, 2018). "Trump Lawyer Sues BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS on Russia Dossier Claims". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 16, 2018. Cohen said he’s mentioned in the dossier 15 times. 
  209. ^ Ghitis, Frida (July 10, 2017). "Donald Trump's Russia Scandal Is Just Getting Started". Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
Further reading
  • Harding, Luke (November 19, 2017). "The Hidden History of Trump's First Trip to Moscow". Politico (an excerpt of his book Collusion). 
  • Harding, Luke (November 16, 2017). Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0525520931. 
  • Hamburger, Tom; Helderman, Rosalind S. (February 6, 2018). "Hero or hired gun? How a British former spy became a flash point in the Russia investigation." The Washington Post.
  • Jane Mayer, Christopher Steele, the Man Behind the Trump Dossier, The New Yorker, March 12, 2018
  • Timeline: The making of the Christopher Steele Trump-Russia dossier, The Washington Post, February 6, 2018
External links
  • Glenn Simpson (August 22, 2017). "Glenn Simpson's testimony re Trump–Russia dossier" (PDF). Official U.S. Senate website of Senator Dianne Feinstein (redacted transcript). Interview with U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. 
  • Glenn Simpson (November 14, 2017). "Glenn Simpson's testimony re Trump-Russia dossier" (PDF). Official U.S. House of Representatives website (redacted transcript). Interview with House Intelligence Committee. 
  • Schiff, Adam (March 20, 2017). "Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Schiff Opening Statement During Hearing on Russian Active Measures". Schiff's official U.S. House website (press release).  Congressman Schiff (D) discusses the dossier.
  • "Grassley Probes Opposition Research Firm behind Unsubstantiated Trump Dossier". Official U.S. Senate website of Senator Chuck Grassley (press release). March 27, 2017.  Senator Grassley (R) discusses the dossier. Includes text of a letter from Grassley to Simpson of Fusion GPS, asking 13 questions.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
  • Timeline
  • Democratic National Committee cyber attacks
    • 2016 email leak
    • Podesta emails
Trump campaign
  • Links between Trump associates and Russian officials
  • Trump campaign–Russian meetings
  • Trump–Russia dossier
Post-election
  • Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections
  • Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act
  • Dismissal of James Comey
  • Special Counsel investigation
  • Nunes memo
  • Russian interference in the 2018 United States elections
Related
  • Cyberwarfare by Russia
  • Russian espionage in the United States
  • The Plot to Hack America
  • Trump: The Kremlin Candidate?
  • v
  • t
  • e
Presidency of Donald Trump Campaigns
  • 2000 presidential campaign
  • 2016 presidential campaign
    • Make America Great Again
    • Rallies
  • Republican primaries
    • Endorsements
    • Debates
    • Convention
  • General election
    • Endorsements
    • Debates
    • International reactions
  • Assassination attempt
  • Stop Trump movement
    • Republican opposition
    • Mitt Romney speech
  • Sexual misconduct allegations
    • Access Hollywood recording
  • 2020 presidential campaign
    • rallies
Presidency Timeline and trips
  • Timeline
    • First 100 days
    • 2017 Q1
    • 2017 Q2
    • 2017 Q3
    • 2017 Q4
    • 2018 Q1
    • 2018 Q2
  • Trips
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • International trips
Tenure
  • Transition
  • Inauguration
    • Speech
  • Opinion polling
  • 2018 midterm elections
  • Disclosures of classified information
  • Executive actions
    • Proclamations
  • Mexico–United States diplomatic crisis
  • 2017–18 North Korea crisis
  • Pardon of Joe Arpaio
  • Recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel
  • Stormy Daniels scandal
  • Syria strikes
    • 2017
    • 2018
  • Travel ban
    • Reactions
    • Legal challenges
    • Revocation and replacement
  • Trump Tower wiretapping allegations
  • Trump–Tsai call
  • United States–Saudi Arabia arms deal
  • United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement
Appointments
and dismissals Appointments
  • Holdovers from previous administrations
  • Withdrawn appointees
  • Short-tenure appointees
  • United States Ambassadors
  • United States Attorneys
  • Cabinet
    • Cabinet formation
  • Economic advisors
  • Federal judges
    • Judicial appointment controversies
    • Supreme Court candidates
    • Justice Neil Gorsuch
  • United States Marshals
Dismissals and resignations
  • Sally Yates
  • U.S. attorneys
  • James Comey
  • Rex Tillerson
Political positions
  • Economy
    • Trump tariffs
  • Environment
  • Foreign policy
    • as candidate
    • as President
    • America First
  • Immigration
  • Racial views
  • Social issues
    • cannabis
Russia controversies
  • Trump business projects in Russia
  • Russian interference in 2016 election
    • Timeline
  • Trump–Russia dossier
  • Links between Trump associates and Russian officials
  • Trump campaign–Russian meetings
  • Special Counsel investigation
Protests and pro-Trump
demonstrations Protests against Trump
  • Timeline
  • 2016 Chicago rally protest
  • GrabYourWallet
  • Nasty woman
  • 2016 Oakland riots
  • 2016 Portland, Oregon riots
  • DisruptJ20
  • Impeachment efforts
  • 2017 Women's March
    • Portland
    • Seattle
    • list
  • Protests against the Travel ban
    • list
  • Day Without Immigrants 2017
  • Not My Presidents Day
  • Day Without a Woman
  • Tax March
  • March for Science
    • 2017 list
    • Portland
  • People's Climate March
  • 2017 May Day protests
  • March for Truth
  • Impeachment March
  • U.S. national anthem protests
  • 2018 Women's March
    • list
  • March for Our Lives
    • list
    • Albany
    • Portland
Pro-Trump demonstrations
  • March 4 Trump
  • Trump Free Speech Rally
  • Mother of All Rallies


Twitter
 
Facebook
 
LinkedIn
 
 

 
 

WhmSoft Moblog
Copyright (C) 2006-2018 WhmSoft
All Rights Reserved